Monday, January 6, 2014

llgo on ssa

Hello there!

I've been busy hacking on llgo again. In case you're new here: llgo is a Go frontend for LLVM that I've been working on for the past ~2 years on and off. It's been quite a while since I last wrote; there has been a bunch of new work since, so I have some things to talk about at last.

A few months ago, I started working on rewriting swathes of llgo's internals to base it on go.tools/ssa. LLVM uses an SSA representation, which made the process fairly straightforward. Basing llgo on go.tools/ssa gives me much higher confidence in the quality of the output; it also presented a good opportunity to clean up llgo's source itself, which I have begun, but certainly not finished. llgo is now able to compile all packages in the standard library, except those that require cgo (net, os/user, runtime/cgo).

llgo now works something like this:
  1. Go source is scanned and parsed by go/ast and go/parser, producing an AST;
  2. The AST is fed into go/types, type-checking;
  3. The output of go/types is passed onto go.tools/ssa, which generates the SSA form;
  4. llgo translates the go.tools/ssa SSA form into an LLVM module,
  5. llgo-build links the LLVM modules for a program together and translates to an executable.

go.tools/ssa supports translating a whole program to SSA form, but llgo works in the traditional way: packages are translated one at a time. Whole program optimisation is enabled by linking the LLVM modules together, prior to any translation to machine code.

There were a few bits that I stumbled on, when rewriting. Alan Donovan, the author of go.tools/ssa, was kind enough to give me some assistance along the way. Anyway, the main issues I had were:

  • Translating Phi nodes requires a bit of finessing, to ensure processing of the Phi or the edges is not order-sensitive. This was dealt with by generating placeholder values for instructions that haven't yet been visited, and then replacing them later.
  • ssa.Index is emitted for indexing into arrays. If an array is in a register, then indexing it means extracting a value; in LLVM, an array element extraction requires a constant index. This is currently kludged by storing to a temporary alloca, and using the getelementptr LLVM instruction. Hopefully I'm missing something and this is easily fixed.
  • The Recover block is not dominated by the entry block, so it may not be valid for it to refer to the Alloc instructions for parameters and results. To deal with this, I generate a prologue block that contains the param/result Allocs; the prologue block conditionally jumps to either the recover or entry block, depending on panic/recover control flow. Alan has agreed to do something along these lines in go.tools/ssa.
  • The ssa.Next instruction required some assumptions to be made about block ordering and instruction placement, in order to be able to translate string-range using Phi nodes. Recent changes to go.tools/ssa exposed the dominator tree, making it possible to do away with the assumption now.


Various significant changes have been made during the course of the migration to go.tools/ssa:
  • Interfaces are now represented like in gc: empty interfaces with the runtime type & data, non-empty interfaces with an "itab" and data. Russ Cox wrote an article about the interface representation back in 2009.
  • Panic/recover (and defer, by consequence) are now using setjmp/longjmp. I had been using exceptions, but it was rightly pointed out to me that this wouldn't work unless there were a way of doing non-call exceptions in LLVM (which has not been implemented). The setjmp/longjmp approach incurs a cost for every function that may defer or recover, but it works without modifications to LLVM. Perhaps this will be revisited in the future.
  • go/types/typemap is now used for mapping types.Types to runtime type descriptors and LLVM types. Runtime type descriptors are now generated more completely, and more correctly. Identical type descriptors will now be merged at link-time.
  • llgo no longer generates conditional branching for calls to non-global functions, when comparing structs, or in map iteration. Apart from producing better code, this makes it much simpler to work with go.tools/ssa, which has its own idea about how the SSA basic blocks relate to one another.

There have also been miscellaneous bug fixes, and improvements, not directly related to the move to go.tools/ssa. Some highlights:
  • A custom importer/exporter, thanks to Fredrik Ehnbom. The importer side is disabled at the moment, due to an apparent bug in go.tools/ssa.
  • Debugger support, thanks again to Fredrik Ehnbom. I haven't reenabled it since the move to go.tools/ssa. I'll get onto that real soon now, because debugging without it can be tiresome.
  • llgo-build can now take a "-test" flag that causes llgo-build to compile the test Go files, yet again thanks to Fredrik Ehnbom. This is currently reliant on the binary importer being enabled, so it won't work out of the box until that bug is fixed.
  • Shifts now generate correct values for shifts greater than the width of the lhs operand.
  • Signed integer conversions now sign-extend correctly.
  • bytes.Compare now works as it should (-1, 0, 1, not <0, 0, >0). "llgo-build -test bytes": PASS
  • llgo-build can now take a "-run" flag that causes llgo-build to execute and then dispose of the resulting binary.
  • Type strings are propagated to LLVM types, making the IR more legible, thanks to Travis Cline.

I think that's everything. I have various things I'd like to tackle now, but not enough time to do it all at once. If you're interested in helping out then there's plenty to do, including:

  • Move to using libgo. Ideally the gc runtime would be rewritten in Go already, but that's not going to happen just yet. The compiler and linker are due to be rewritten in Go soon, which is a lot of work as it is.
  • Finish off runtime type descriptor generation (notably, type algorithms).
  • Get PNaCl support working again. This should be pretty close, but requires the binary importer to be enabled.
  • Implement cgo support.
  • Implement bounds checking, nil pointer checks, etc.
  • Get garbage collection working. There's Pull Request #108, but this is perpetuating the problem that is llgo's custom runtime. Since GC is fairly invasive, I don't want to go tying llgo to that runtime any more than it is currently. I expect this will have to wait until libgo is integrated.
  • Escape analysis. This is a must-have, but not immediately necessarily. The implementation should be based on go.tools/ssa, interfacing with the exporter/importer to record/consume information about external functions.
  • Make use of go.tools/ssa/ssautil/Switches. This is an optimisation, so again, not immediately necessary.

If you want to have a play around, then grab LLVM and Go, and then:

  • go get github.com/axw/llgo/cmd/llgo-dist && llgo-dist
  • llgo-build <some/package> or llgo-build file1.go, file2.go, ...
Let me know how you get on with that.


Here's hoping 2014 can be a productive year for llgo. Happy new year.


Cheers,
Andrew

Friday, August 16, 2013

llgo update #14

Ahoy there, mateys!

It's been three months since our last correspondence. Apologies for the negligence. I've been busy, as usual, but it's more self-inflicted than usual. I've taken up a new role at Canonical, working on Juju. I'm really excited about Juju (both the concept and realisation), and the fact that it's written in Go is icing on the cake. Working remotely is taking some getting used to, but so far it's been pretty swell. Anyway, you didn't come here to read about that, did you?

I'm still working on llgo in the background, quietly prodding it along towards the 0.1 milestone. There's just one big ticket item left, and that's partially done now: channels. I've just finished porting the basics of channels from gc's standard library to llgo's runtime. That doesn't include select, which is entirely missing. When that's done, I'll be content to release 0.1.

So what's new since last time?

  • There's a new llgo-build tool, which takes the pain out of building packages and programs with llgo and the LLVM toolchain. Just run "llgo-build <package>", and you'll either build and install a package, or build a program in the working directory. There's no freshness checking, so you're currently required to manually build all dependencies before building a program.
  • Simplified building against PNaCl: llgo-dist now accepts a "-pepper" option, which points to a NaCl SDK.
  • Implemented support for map literals.
  • Implemented complex number arithmetic.
  • Implemented channels (apart from anything select-related)
  • Numerous bug fixes.
In my previous post I talked about having implemented panic/recover, and having implemented them in terms of DWARF exception handling. Well, it looks like PNaCl isn't going to support that, at least initially, so a setjmp/longjmp version is likely inevitable now.

I also said I would be working on a temporary for of cmd/go. I gave up on that, after hitting a few stumbling blocks. I figured it was more important to actually get the compiler and runtime working than get bogged down in the tooling, hence the simpler llgo-build tool.

That's about it! "Feature complete" is getting closer, though lots of things still don't work very nicely. Still no garbage collection, no proper escape analysis, etc. Those will come in time.

For now, though... I think I might go catch up on some sleep.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

llgo on Go 1.1

Hi folks,

(For those of you coming from HN/Twitter/elsewhere, this is a post about llgo. llgo is an LLVM frontend for the Go programming language).

In my last post I mentioned that work had began on moving to Go 1.1 compatibility; this has been my primary focus since then. Since Go 1.1 is now released (woohoo!), I've gone ahead and pulled all the changes back into the master branch on GitHub. If you want to play around, you can do the following:

  1. Get Go 1.1.
  2. Get Clang and LLVM (I've tested with 3.2, Ubuntu x86-64). Make sure llvm-config is in your $PATH.
  3. Run "go get github.com/axw/llgo/cmd/llgo-dist"
  4. Run "llgo-dist". This will install llgo into $GOBIN, and build the runtime.


The biggest new feature would have to be: defer, panic and recover (I'm lumping them together as they're closely related). I've implemented them on top of LLVM's exception handling support. The panic and recover functions are currently tied to DWARF exception handling, though it's simple enough that it should be feasible to use setjmp/longjmp on platforms where DWARF exception handling isn't viable.

Aside from that, there's some new bits and bobs:

  • Method sets are handled properly now (or at least not completely wrong like before). This means you can use a embedded types' methods to satisfy an interface.
  • "return" requirements are now checked by go/types
  • cap() is now implemented for slices.
  • llgo-dist now builds against the LLVM static libraries (if available) by default now, with an option for building against the shared libraries.

I'll be working on a temporary fork of cmd/go to build programs with llgo, while a long-term solution is figured out. I'd also like to get PNaCl integration working again, given that its release is nigh.

That's all for now.

Friday, March 1, 2013

llgo update #12

Oh my, it's been a while.

In my previous post I wrote about llgo and PNaCl. I haven't had much time to play with PNaCl recently, but I have been prodding llgo along. In February, my wife gave birth to our son, Jeremy, so naturally I've been busy. But anyway, let's talk about what has been happening in llgo. Quick, while he's sleeping!

Feature-wise, there's nothing terribly exciting going on. Without getting too boring, what's new is:

  • A new "go1.1" branch in the Git repository. The go1.1 branch aims to make llgo compatible with the Go tip, and will replace the master branch when Go 1.1 is released.
  • Removed llgo/types (a fork of the old exp/types package), and moved to go/types.
  • Updated runtime type representations to match those from gc's tip (thanks to minux for initiating this effort).
  • Updated to use architecture-specific size for "int" (same as uintptr).
  • Changed function representation to be a pair of pointers, to avoid trampolines/runtime code generation for closures. The rationale is the same as for rsc's proposal for Go 1.1; using runtime code generation limits the environments that Go can run in (e.g. PNaCl).
  • A slew of bug fixes and minor enhancements.
The go/types change in particular was not a small one, but llgo came out much better at the end. As of the most recent go/types commits, llgo now passes all of its tests in the go1.1 branch. Now I can get back to implementing features again.

That's about all there is to report. It has been suggested that I set up some milestones in the GitHub project; I will spend a bit of time coming up with what I think are the bare essentials for a 0.1 release, and what would constitute future releases and so on.

One last thing: there's a new(ish) llgo-dev mailing list. If you want to get involved, or just lurk, come and join the party.

Until next time.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Go in the Browser: llgo does PNaCl


Last week I briefly reported on Google+ that I had written a Go-based Native Client module, built it with llgo, and successfully loaded it into Google Chrome. I'd like to expand on this a little now, and describe how to build and run it.

Before your start...

If you want to want to try this out yourself, then you'll need to grab yourself a copy of the Native Client SDK. I've only tested this on Ubuntu Linux 12.10 (x86-64), so if you're trying this out on a different OS/arch you may need to alter the instructions.

Anyway, grab the SDK according to the instructions on the page I linked to above. Be sure to get the devevelopment/unstable branch, by updating with the "pepper_canary" target:
$ cd nacl_sdk; ./naclsdk update pepper_canary

This is not a small download, so go and brew some tea, or just read on to see where we're going with this.

The anatomy of a PNaCl module

By now I guess you probably know what Native Client is, but if you don't, I suggest you take a moment to read about it on the Google Developers (https://developers.google.com/native-client/) site. What may not be so well known is PNaCl, the next evolution of Native Client. PNaCl (pronounced pinnacle), is short for Portable Native Client, and is based on LLVM.

Developers continue to write their code the same as in traditional NaCl, but now it is compiled to LLVM bitcode; PNaCl restricts usage to a portable subset of bitcode so that it can then be translated to native x86, x86-64, or ARM machine code. To compile C or C++ modules to PNaCl/LLVM bitcode, one uses the pnacl-clang compiler provided with the Native Client SDK.

To make use of Native Client, one develops a module, which is an executable, that can be loaded into Google Chrome (or Chromium). A module implements certain functions specified in the Pepper API (PPAPI), which is the API that interfaces your module with the browser. One of the functions is PPP_InitializeModule, and another is PPP_GetInterface. The former provides a function pointer to the module for calling back into the browser; the latter is invoked to interrogate the module for interfaces that it implements.

A nacl/ppapi package for Go

Since llgo speaks LLVM, it should be feasible to write PNaCl modules in Go, right? Right! So I set about doing this last week, and found that it was fairly easy to do. I have written a demo module which you can find here: https://github.com/axw/llgo/tree/master/pkg/nacl/ppapi, which I later intend to morph into a reusable Go package, with a proper API. I have made a lot of shortcuts, and the code is not particularly idiomatic Go; bear in mind that llgo is still quite immature, and that this is mostly a proof of concept.

Most of the code in the package is scaffolding; the example module is mostly defined in example.go, some also in ppapi.go. At the top of example.go, we instantiate a pppInstance1_1, which is a structure which defines the “Instance” interface. This interface is used to communicate the lifecycle of an instance of the module; when a module is loaded in a web page, then this interface is invoked. We care about when a module instance is created, and when it is attached to a view (i.e. the area of the page which contains the module). Note that when I say interface, I mean a PPAPI interface, not a Go interface. Later, I hope to have modules implement Go interfaces, and hide the translation to PPAPI interfaces.

The example is contrived, and quite simple; it demonstrates the use of the Graphics2D interface, which, as the name suggests, enables a module to perform 2D graphics operations. The demo simply draws repeating rectangles of different colours, animated by regularly updating the graphics context and shifting the pixels on each iteration. I would have used the standard “image” Go package, but unfortunately llgo is currently having trouble compiling it. I'll look into that soon.

Building llgo

Alright, how do we build this thing? We're going to do the following things:
  1. Build llgo, and related tools.
  2. Compile the PNaCl-module Go code into an LLVM module.
  3. Link the llgo runtime into the module.
  4. Link the ppapi library from the Native Client SDK into the module.
  5. Translate the module into a native executable.*

*The final step is currently necessary, but eventually Chrome/Chromium will perform the translation in the browser.

Let's begin by building the llgo-dist tool. This will be used to build the llgo compiler, runtime, and linker. More on each of those in a moment. Go ahead and build llgo-dist:

$ go get github.com/axw/llgo/cmd/llgo-dist

The llgo-dist tool takes two options: -llvm-config, and -triple. The former is the path to the llvm-config tool, and defaults to simply “llvm-config” (i.e. find it using PATH). The latter is the LLVM target triple used for compiling the runtime package (and other core packages, like syscall). The Native Client SDK contains an llvm-config and the shared library that we need to link with to use LLVM's C API.

As I said above, I'm running on Linux x86-64, so for my case, the llvm-config tool can be found in:

$ nacl_sdk/pepper_canary/toolchain/linux_x86_pnacl/host_x86_64/bin/llvm-config

At this point, you should put the “host_<arch>/bin” directory in your PATH, and the “host_<arch>/lib” directory in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH, as llgo currently requires it, and I refer to executables without their full paths in some cases.

The Native Client SDK creates shared libraries with the target armv7-none-linux-gnueabi, so we'll do the same. Let's go ahead and build llgo now.

$ llgo-dist -triple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -llvm-config=nacl_sdk/pepper_canary/toolchain/linux_x86_pnacl/host_x86_64/bin/llvm-config

We now have a compiler, linker, and runtime. As an aside, on my laptop it took about 2.5s to build, which is great! The gc toolchain is a wonderful thing. You can safely ignore the warning about “different data layouts” when llgo-dist compiles the syscall package, as we will not be using the syscall package in our example.

Building the example

Now, let's compile the PNaCl module:

$ llgo -c -o main.o -triple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi llgo/pkg/nacl/ppapi/*.go llgo/testdata/programs/nacl/example.go

This creates a file called “main.o”, which contains the LLVM bitcode for the module. Next, we'll link in the runtime. Eventually, I hope that the “go” tool will be able to support llgo (I have hacked mine up to do this), but for now you're going to have to do this manually.

$ llgo-link -o main.o main.o $GOPATH/pkg/llgo/armv7-none-linux-gnueabi/runtime.a

Now we have a module with the runtime linked in. The llgo runtime defines things like functions for appending to slices, manipulating maps, etc. Later, it will contain a more sophisticated memory allocator, a garbage collector runtime, and a goroutine scheduler.

We can't translate this to a native executable yet, because it lacks an entry point. In a PNaCl module, the entry point is defined in a shared library called libppapi_stub.a, which is included by the libppapi.a linker script. We can link this in using pnacl-clang, like so:

$ pnacl-clang -o main.pexe main.o -lppapi

This creates a portable executable (.pexe), an executable still in LLVM bitcode form. As I mentioned earlier, this will eventually be the finished product, ready to load into Chrome/Chromium. For now, we need to run a final step to create the native machine code executable:

$ pnacl-translate -arch x86-64 -o main_x86_64.nexe main.pexe

That's it. If you want to load this in an x86 or ARM system, you'll also need to translate the pexe to an x86 and/or ARM nexe. Now we can run it.

Loading the PNaCl module into Chrome

I'm not sure at what point all the necessary parts became available in Chrome/Chromium, so I'll just say what I'm running: I have added the Google Chrome PPA, and installed google-chrome-beta. This is currently at version 24.0.1312.35 beta.

By default, Chrome only allows Native Client modules to load from the Chrome Web Store, but you can override this by mucking about in about:flags. Load up Chrome, go to about:flags, enable “Native Client”, and restart Chrome so the change takes effect. Curiously, there's a “Portable Native Client” flag; it may be that the translator is already inside Chrome, but I'm not aware of how to use it.



To simplify matters, I'm going to hijack the hello_world example in the Native Client SDK. If you want to start from scratch, refer to the Native Client SDK documentation. So anyway we'll build the hello_world example, then replace the executable with our own one.

$ cd nacl_sdk/examples/hello_world
$ make pnacl/Release/hello_world.nmf
$ cp <path/to/main_x86_64.nexe> pnacl/Release/hello_world_x86_64.nexe

Now start an HTTP server to serve this application (inside the hello_world directory):

$ python -m SimpleHTTPServer
Serving HTTP on 0.0.0.0 port 8000 ...

Finally, navigate to the following location:


Behold, animated bars! Obviously the example is awfully simplistic, but the I wanted to get this out so others can start playing with it. I'm not really in the business of fancy graphics, so I'll leave more impressive demos to others.

Next Steps

I'll keep dabbling with this, but my more immediate goals are to complete llgo's general functionality. As wonderful as all of this is, it's no good if the compiler doesn't work correctly. Anyway, once I do get some more time for this, I intend to:
  • Clean up nacl/ppapi, providing an external API.
  • Update llgo-link to transform a “main” function into a global constructor (i.e. an “init” function) when compiling for PNaCl.
  • Update llgo-link to link in libppapi_stub.a when compiling for PNaCl, so we don't need to use pnacl-clang. Ideally we should be able to “go build”, and have that immediately ready to be loaded into Chrome.
  • Get the image package to build, and update nacl/ppapi to use it.
  • Implement syscall for PNaCl. This will probably involve calling standard POSIX C functions, like read, write, mmap, etc. Native Client code is heavily sandboxed, but provides familiar POSIX APIs to do things like file I/O.
If you play around with this and produce something interesting, please let me know.

That's all for now – have fun!


Sunday, November 25, 2012

llgo update #10: "hello, world!" redux

It's about time for another progress update on llgo. I've made decent progress recently, so let's go through what's new.

Highlights

I've been refactoring bits of code and fixing bugs aplenty, so there is a mass of noise in the git commits. In terms of new function, the news is that we now have:

  • Type switches.
  • Type assertions.
  • Labeled statements; goto, labeled break and continue.
  • The llgo-dist command; more on this below.
  • String conversions: to/from byte slices; from rune/int.
  • String range. I'm sure the implementation could be improved.
  • Implemented sync/atomic using LLVM atomic operations intrinsics.
  • Various changes to enable linking multiple packages (e.g. exported symbols are now prefixed with their package path).
  • Additional support for floats (thanks to spate); partial support for complex numbers.
  • "...args" calls to variadic functions (including slice append).
  • A self-contained runtime package. I have cloned (and slightly modified in some cases) the Go portion of the runtime package from gc, and combined it with the runtime code I had already written for llgo.
  • Bridge code for the math package, which mostly just redirects the exported functions to the internal, pure-Go implementations.
  • System calls (Linux/AMD64 only so far).
  • Closures; more below.

llgo-dist

I have begun implementing a command that takes care of building llgo, its runtime, and in the future any other tools that might be considered part of llgo (e.g. an in-development linker). This tool will set up the cgo flags given the path to an "llvm-config" program, and build gollvm.

reflect, fmt, oh my!


Last week, I mentioned on Google+ that I managed to get the reflect package working. At least enough of it to get the fmt package to work. At least enough of the fmt package to get fmt.Println("Hello, world!") to work... Yep, the holy grail of programming examples now compiles, links, and runs, using llgo. This demonstrates the following things work:

  1. Compilation of the following packages: errors, io, math, os, reflect, runtime, strconv, sync, sync/atomic, syscall, time, unicode/utf8, unsafe.
  2. Package imports (still using the gcimporter from exp/types.)
  3. Linking multiple compiled packages using llvm-link.
  4. Interfaces and reflection (fmt.Println uses reflection to determine the underlying type).
  5. System calls (fmt.Println will eventually issue a system call to write to the stdout file).

Closures

Yes indeed, we now have closures. The code is pretty hackish, so I expect it's not very solid. I have implemented them using LLVM's trampoline intrinsics. Essentially you provide LLVM with a function that takes N parameters, give it a block of (executable) memory and an argument to bind, and it fills in the block with function code for a function with N-1 parameters (the Nth one being bound).

Unfortunately I have found that the closures are not playing nicely with lli/JIT, which means the closure unit test I have written fails. If I compile it with llc/gcc, though, it works just fine. So either I've done something subtly stupid, or the JIT is clobbering something it shouldn't. As far as I got with debugging was finding that the bound argument value is wrong when the function is entered.

I expect I'll probably replace this implementation for a couple of reasons:

  • Portability: I'd rather avoid platform-specific code like this. For one thing, the PNaCl ABI calls out trampoline intrinsics as being unsupported.
  • Testability: I should investigate the problems I observed with lli/JIT further, and I'm loath to change implementation to support tests, it is a real problem. I rely heavily on tests to make sure I haven't broken anything.
Until I find out that using trampolines has a marked benefit to performance in real programs, I intend to replace the current implementation with one that uses a pair of pointers for functions. The bound argument will stored in one pointer, and the function pointer in another. This has implications for all function calls, though it should be simple to achieve good performance in most cases.

What's next?

Haven't figured this one out yet. I have been meaning to play more with PNaCl, so I might take some time now to do that. I expect I'll be slowing down development considerably early 2013, as (a) we're knocking down our place and rebuilding, and (b) my second child is on the way. I hope to have llgo in a better state for contributions by then, so others can pick up the slack.

I expect in the near future I'll start playing with clang/cgo integration, as I start playing with PNaCl. I'll write back when I have something to demonstrate.

Until then.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

llgo update, milestone

In between gallivanting in Sydney, working, and organising to have a new house built, I've squeezed in a little bit of work on llgo. If you've been following along on Github, you'll have seen that things have progressed a bit since last time I wrote.

Aside from a slew of bug fixes and trivialities, llgo now implements:

  • Slice operations (make, append, slice expressions). I've only implemented single-element appends so far, i.e. No append(s, a, b, c, ...) or (s, abc...) yet.
  • Named results in functions.
  • Maps - creation, indexing, assignment, and deletion. The underlying implementation is just a dumb linked-list at this point in time. I'll implement it as a hash map in the future, when there aren't more important things to implement.
  • Range statements for arrays, slices and maps. I haven't done strings yet, simply because it requires a bit more thought into iterating through strings runes-at-a-time. I don't expect it'll be too much work.
  • Branch statements, except for goto. You can now break, continue, and fallthrough.
  • String indexing, and slicing.
  • Function literals. Once upon a time these were working, but they haven't been for a while. Now they are again. Note that this does not include support for closures at this stage, so usefulness is pretty limited.

Early on in the development of llgo, I decided that rather than implementing the compiler by going through the specification one item at a time, I'd drive the development by attempting to compile a real program. For this, I chose maketables, a program from the unicode standard library package. As of today, llgo can successfully compile the program. That is, it compiles that specific file, maketables.go. It doesn't yet compile all of its dependencies, and it certainly doesn't link or produce a usable program.

So now I'll be working towards getting all of the dependencies compiling, then linking. In the interest of seeing usable progress, I think I might now take a bottom-up approach and start focusing on the core libraries, like runtime and syscall. I'll report back when I have something interesting to say.